whatisaccrecon.jpg (22615 bytes)
An "accident" is defined as "an unexpected and undesirable event". Accident reconstruction is a branch of causation forensics which involves determining how and why an accident happened - accomplished first by correctly interpreting the clues left by the remaining physical evidence of the accident, then by reconstructing and studying the events preceding, during, and following the accident.

A peculiarity of this profession is that accident reconstructions are methodically worked backwards, time-wise - from the end results back to the beginning sequence of events. All kinds of accidents are investigated through reconstruction methodology — plane crashes, crane failures, bridge collapses, vehicular collisions, etc. Reconstructions of traffic collisions, specifically, typically involve determining the factors which contributed to the cause and severity of the collision, such as excessive speed, poor visibility, a defective tire, the failure of an occupant to wear a safety belt, or the disregard of traffic control devices.

Don't the police already do this?
A police officer's duty after an accident is to document basic event information (mainly to satisfy a statistical need by the city or state's government), try to determine fault for his/her report (usually by interviewing drivers and witnesses to find out if any traffic laws have been violated), call for care for the injured, and to maintain safety around an accident scene. Very few traffic collisions are technically investigated by the police if no fatalities are involved. In most official traffic accident reports, the details necessary for an accurate reconstruction of the collision are scarce.

The arrow indicates an abrasion on the "D" ring of a 3 point seatbelt, which was produced by the heavy loading of the occupant's body acting on the webbing (lower left) at impact.The abrasion is a conclusive indication that the seat's occupant was belted during the collision.Officers trained in accident reconstruction are rare, and as a result police can, and do, unintentionally overlook fraud and deception and other factual anomalies at an accident scene because they can't reconcile the differences between the physical evidence and the conflicting statements of witnesses. The driver with the most believable story often prevails. Errors aren't uncommon.

Evidence such as tiremarks and furrows in the dirt can quickly disappear. The chances are excellent that, not only will these important clues not have been measured and documented, they won't even be mentioned in the police report.

Next page


ABOUT FACTS           CRASH LINKS & ARTICLES